Public goods

Goods where access to the good cannot be restricted and where use by one individual does not reduce availability to others. 

See also: Environmental Public Goods

Public goods games

are a widely applied economic experiments. In a public goods game, a group of people is endowed with resources which they can either place in a private or a joint account (public good). In a standard linear voluntary contributions public goods game, all benefits are internalised from the private account, but only a fraction is internalised from the group account. However, the group account generates additional benefits, creating a social dilemma (a clash between self-interest and group interest) where it is individually rational to free-ride on the contributions of others, but socially optimal to contribute everything.

In Contracts2.0 we will use public goods games to investigate the impact of contract characteristics on collective decision-making.

Results-based payments

are an approach where farmers and land managers are paid for delivering environmental outcomes, for example for enhancing the presence of important grassland species. In these schemes, farmers determine the management required to achieve the desired result, rather than following prescribed management actions. The advantage of this approach over a practice-based approach is the increased flexibility of farmers regarding management decisions. The self-interest and intrinsic motivation of farmers to perform well are likely to raise effectiveness and possibly efficiency.

Synonym: Result-based approach; outcome-based approach; payment-by-result

See also: Practice-based approach

Reward

Remuneration for current ecological achievements (e.g. biodiversity, climate or water protection) without a necessary additionality.

See also: Compensation

Social network analysis

Social network analysis (SNA) is a methodological approach that has been found very useful in dissecting and better understanding complex governance arrangements. In this context, it has been applied in numerous studies to understand how social structures and relationships impact on natural resource management and ecosystem services governance (e.g. Isaac and Matous 2017, Mbaru and Barnes 2017, Bodin and Crona 2009). It aims to analyse how the structural features of an actors’ networks, defined by the number and type of nodes and the social ties connecting them, inform individual choices on ecosystem management.