Moral hazard

refers to the concept of information asymmetry between principal (e.g. state) and agent (e.g. farmer) which can lower environmental effectiveness of schemes (see also adverse selection). This could be the case when land managers have no intention of delivering their side of the contract. Peer-pressure can be a solution (Franks, 2011).

Synonym: Opportunistic behaviour or hidden action

References

Franks, J. (2011) The collective provision of environmental goods: a discussion of contractual issues, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54:5, 637-660, DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2010.526380

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a general framework for supporting complex decision-making situations with multiple and often conflicting objectives that stakeholder groups and/or decision-makers value differently. MCDA methods are integrative evaluation methods in the sense that they combine information about the performance of the alternatives with respect to the criteria with subjective judgments about the relative importance of the evaluation criteria in the particular decision-making context.

Nature Contributions to People (NCPs)

refers to “all the contributions, both positive and negative, of living nature (diversity of organisms, ecosystems, and their associated ecological and evolutionary processes) to people’s quality of life” (Díaz et al. 2015). This concept differs from ecosystem services (ES) in the sense that while ES are provided by nature, NCPs are jointly produced by social-ecological processes and require human intervention to deliver them (Bruley et al., 2021).

See also: Ecosystem services (ES)

References

Bruley, E., Locatelli, B. and Lavorel, S., 2021. Nature’s contributions to people: coproducing quality of life from multifunctional landscapes. Ecology and Society 26 (1):12. DOI: 10.5751/ES-12031-260112
Díaz, S., S. Demissew, J. Carabias, C. Joly, M. Lonsdale, N. Ash (…) and D. Zlatanova, 2015. The IPBES conceptual framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14:1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

Net-Map tool

One particular method for social network analysis (SNA) is the Net-Map tool (cf. Schiffer and Hauck 2010). Net-Map is an interview-based, participatory network mapping method which combines quantitative SNA measurements with qualitative network narratives. The Net-Map tool aims to identify all relevant actors in a concrete governance setting, understand actors’ roles and interlinkages, their motives, influence, and obtained benefits. The network maps co-created during the interviews by the interviewee and interviewer are then used to discuss striking characteristics of the mapped network, such as absent links between actors, very central actors, or similar where underlying reasons are provided through the qualitative information gathered through the interviews.

References

Schiffer, E. and Hauck, J. (2010). Net-Map: Collecting Social Network Data and Facilitating Network Learning through Participatory Influence Network Mapping. Field Methods 22(3) 231-249. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X10374798

Participatory workshop

An event involving possibly all the different stakeholders interested in the analysed issue. The interactive workshop is using both systematically collected empirical material (surveys, interviews, document-analysis, etc.) and stakeholders’ knowledge to gain new insights, to increase engagement and add legitimacy to the decision-making. It uses several different participatory methods.